HANDLING OF LEWD CONDUCT COMPLAINTS
PURPOSE
This Field Operations Directive provides supplemental guidance to ensure fair and consistent suppression, intervention, training, and education for the public and deputies in the prevention of lewd conduct, public sexual conduct and/or indecent exposure complaints. The prevention efforts outlined within this policy are the responsibility of the patrol unit commanders, and allow for prevention efforts to be tailored to the unique needs of an individual station area.
The Sheriff's Department's primary goal in responding to complaints of public sexual activity is not only to handle the specific incident, but more importantly, to prevent future and ongoing incidents from occurring. Each station should work with various affected parties and agencies, including local government, LASD Parks Bureau, parks and recreation authorities, business owners and community members, to make problem areas frequented for this type of activity, such as public malls, parks, restrooms, parking areas, rest stops and alleys, less conducive to these behaviors.
Station management should work with and encourage local businesses and landlords to take responsibility and ensure that their premises do not create a nuisance by encouraging or being conducive to acts of lewd conduct. Stations shall complete a comprehensive operational plan to document the nature of the complaints and detail the station's prevention, intervention and suppression efforts.
POLICY
The policy for the handling of lewd conduct includes the following components:
PROCEDURES
The primary unit responsible for handling complaints of public sexual activity shall be the patrol station who has the responsibility over the area where the complaints are received. If a pattern of lewd conduct behavior emerges (i.e. continuous complaints), the station patrol commander is responsible for the development of a community- involved education, prevention, and suppression plan to help curb the conduct.
The following steps should be taken when addressing complaints of public sexual activity:
The following preventative measures should be considered in the development of the Operations Plan, in making areas less conducive to lewd conduct activity:
As stated, Patrol Unit Commanders have the overall responsibility for the implementation of any operations plan designed to address the issue of lewd conduct in their station's jurisdiction. Following the execution of the operations plan, an after- action report shall be prepared to fully document and critique the impact and effectiveness of enforcement efforts. The report shall include a summary of the steps taken to mitigate the illicit activity along with an assessment of the results.
Upon review of the after-action report, if it is apparent that all station resources have been exhausted and the station’s actions have failed to alleviate the problem, the unit commander should contact Major Crimes Bureau and request the assistance and/or advice of their Vice Unit. In circumstances where special enforcement is required, patrol station commanders are encouraged to consult Major Crimes Bureau.
Detective Division/Major Crimes Bureau may initiate lewd conduct operations/investigations in any station area based upon complaints or information received directly from the public, Department members, confidential informants, or other sources who commonly provide information on criminal conduct. Absent extenuating circumstances, prior notification from Major Crimes Bureau to the Unit Commander will accompany any lewd conduct operation/investigation in that station area.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
In the case of Pryor v. Municipal Court (25 Cal.3d 238), the California Supreme Court ruled that four factors must be present to establish a “Disorderly Conduct” violation of Penal Code section 647(a):
In the case of In re Chad Smith (7 Cal. 3d 362), the California Supreme Court ruled that “Indecent Exposure” (314 PC) required that:
The Smith case involved a defendant who was sunbathing in the nude on an isolated public beach. He was subsequently arrested and convicted of violation Penal Code section 314. In overturning the conviction, the State Supreme Court distinguished “nude” from “lewd.” No evidence had been admitted showing that Smith’s conduct had been lewd.
The same principle was also addressed by the California Court of Appeal, Second District in the case of In re Dallas W. (85 Cal. App. 4th 937). This case involved a juvenile subject who “mooned” oncoming traffic and was subsequently convicted of violating Penal Code section 314. In overturning the conviction, the Appellate Court observed that the subject’s purpose in “mooning” traffic was to offend. The purpose was not for “sexual arousal or gratification.” Therefore, the elements of the offense were not present.
AFFECTED DIRECTIVES / PUBLICATIONS
Manual of Policy and Procedures, Section 2-05/090.00 - Adds responsibility for the conduct of lewd conduct undercover operations to Major Crimes Bureau.
Manual of Policy and Procedures, Section 4-22/015.00 - Adds supplemental policy for the handling of lewd conduct offenses.
REFERENCES
Field Operations Support Services Newsletter 04-23 (Elements of 314 PC) California State Supreme Court Decision, Pryor v. Municipal Court (25 Cal.3d 238) California State Supreme Court Decision, In re Chad Merrill Smith (7 Cal. 3d 362)
Court of Appeal of California, Second District Decision, In re Dallas W. (85 Cal. App. 4th 937)