THE USE OF FORCE IN TAKING DUI BLOOD SAMPLES
On May 13, 1991, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided that no more force than is reasonably necessary may be used to compel the taking of a blood sample pursuant to an arrest for driving under the influence (DUI).
Vehicle Code 23157 and 23158 state that the rules for taking a blood sample pursuant to a DUI arrest are as follows:
Blood draws shall be in compliance with the Department’s Manual of Policy and Procedures when both requesting and obtaining blood for evidential value. For suspects who refuse a test, deputy personnel shall advise the suspect of section 13353 CVC, Chemical Test Admonition, and complete the Department of Motor Vehicle form DL 367 as stated in the Manual of Policy and Procedures section 5-08/010.10, Defendant Refuses All Tests. In addition, Field Operations Directive 92-005, Video Recording of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Chemical Test Refusals, sets out the procedures for video recording someone who is refusing a DUI chemical test.
Pursuant to Missouri v. McNeely, if an arrestee refuses a blood test, a search warrant must be obtained if a blood draw is needed for evidential value. See Newsletter 14-13, DUI McNeely Warrant (Blood Test) and the form Affidavit in Support of Search Warrant.
The Fourth Amendment must be considered if any force is used to extract a blood sample. It may be lawful to use force to extract blood from the suspect; however, one has to carefully measure whether to use force and the degree of force that may be used.
If the suspect refuses to take a breath test, is offered a blood test and then agrees to take a breath test, in most cases the breath test should be given. No force should be employed to extract blood under these circumstances unless the evidence would perish in the time required to take a breath test or urine test. The prior refusal to take a breath test would not make the use of force to extract the blood sample reasonable under most circumstances.
Information regarding the content of this newsletter may be directed to Traffic Services Detail or Field Operations Support Services.
REFERENCES:
California State Legislature SB 717 - http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/13-14/bill/sen/sb_0701-0750/sb_717_bill_20130920_chaptered.pdf
Penal Code Section 1524
Vehicle Code Section 23140
Vehicle Code Section 23152
Vehicle Code Section 23153
California District Attorneys Association - (www.CDAA.org).
MPP Section 4-07/035.00, Driving Under the Influence
MPP Section 4-19/062.00, Property Damage, Accidental Traffic Collision Connected
MPP Section 5-04/020.25, Completing the Property Label
MPP Section 5-08/010.00, Chemical Test Laws
MPP Section 5-08/010.05, Defendant’s Rights – Driving Under the Influence (DUI)
MPP Section 5-08/010.10, Defendant Refuses All Tests
MPP Section 5-08,010.15, Breath Alcohol Test Administration
MPP Section 5-08/010.20, Blood Tests
MPP Section 5-08/010.25, Urinalysis
MPP Section 5-08/010.27, Release of Blood Alcohol Samples – Urinalysis and Blood
MPP Section 5-08/010.30, Station Commander’s Responsibility
MPP Section 5-08/010.35, Responsibility for Evidence
MPP Section 5-09/130.00, Drug/Driving Under the Influence – Driver’s History Check
FOD 89-02, Use of Checkpoints for Driving Under the Influence/Driver License Enforcement
FOD 92-05, Video Recording of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) Chemical Test Refusals
Newsletter #50, Recent Appellate DUI Ruling
Newsletter #64, The Use of Force in Taking DUI Blood Samples
Newsletter 01-16, Probably Cause and DUI Reporting
Newsletter 08-08, Zero Tolerance Law – 23136 CVC, Use of Alcohol by Drivers Under 21
Behind the Wheel with the Traffic Safety Resource Prosecutor Program, Vol. 18, No. 9 (September 2013), SB 717 – The McNeely Solution