LEGAL DETENTION: REFUSAL TO PROVIDE IDENTIFICATION
In California, there is no stop-and-identify law which requires an individual to produce identification upon request by a peace officer. During a lawful Terry stop or legal detention, a deputy has the right to request the detained person present for examination “satisfactory identification,” that may include a current driver’s license or the functional equivalent. Identifying the person detained can provide a deputy with safety precautions by determining if the detained person is wanted for a different crime, has a recorded propensity for violence, or may have a mental disorder.
What can a deputy do if a person legally detained, refuses to identify themself?
Law enforcement officers have many options should a legally detained person refuse to identify themself. Some of the options are as follows:
As a general rule, a person’s failure to provide their name, in itself, is not a violation of any law. If the person lawfully detained refuses to provide their name or identification during the investigation and there is insufficient evidence to establish probable cause that the person has committed a crime, then the person must be released.
Witnesses may not be detained - If an investigation reveals that the person lawfully detained was not involved in a crime, but may have been a witness to the crime, they are not required to provide a name or identification and may not be detained for further questioning without their consent. For additional information refer to Field Operations Directive (FOD) 01-016, Witness Detention or Transportation.
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this newsletter, please contact Field Operations Support Services, at (323) 890-5411 or email FOSS@LASD.ORG.
References
California Penal Code sections 853.5 and 853.6
California Vehicle Code sections 40302 and 40307
Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada, 542 U.S. 177 (2005)
Kolender v. Lawson. 461 U.S. 352 (1983)
Delgado, 466 U.S. 210, 216 (1984)
Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 (1985); Russell (2000)81 Cal.App.4th 96, 102-106
Loudermilk (1987) 195 Cal.App.3d 996
Martinelli, 820 F.2d 1491, 1494 (9th cir.1987)
Christian, 356 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th cir.2004)
Chase c. (2015) 243 Cal.App.4th 107
People v. Long (1987) 189 Cal.App3d 77,87.
People v. Garcia, 145 Cal.App.4th 782, 52 Cal.Rptr.3d 70 (2006)
People v. Quiroga, 16 Cal.App.4th 961, pet. rev. den. (S034236 1993)
Terry v. Ohio. 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. Ct. 1868, 20 L. Ed. 2d 889 (1968)
MPP section 5-03/115.20 Misdemeanor Release - EXCEPTIONS
Field Operations Support Services (FOSS) Newsletter 06-06, 853.5 PC-Infraction Release Procedures
Field Operations Directive 01-016, Witness Detention or Transportation
Training Bureau Newsletter, Volume 12, Number 1, PAT-DOWN
O’Malley, N. E. (2019) Investigative detentions. Point of View, Spring/Summer 2019, 47-2.
Ginn, B. (2004) Stop-and-identify laws. The Police Chief Magazine